ABSTRACT
Objective: This study aimed to reveal the prevalence and characteristics of anguish among delirious patients with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care services. Methods: We conducted a subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study at 14 inpatient palliative care units and 10 general wards that offered psycho-oncology consultation service in Japan. We consecutively enrolled the patients with advanced cancer who were diagnosed with delirium and prescribed antipsychotics. Palliative care specialists decided whether patients suffered from anguish or not. We assessed patients’ background and severity of delirium with the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised (DRS-R-98). Results: Of 818 enrolled patients, 99 (12.1%) suffered from anguish. We observed a significant difference in the mean age (68.9±12.6 vs. 72.1±11.2, p=0.009), prevalence of dementia (2% vs. 10.4%, p=0.005) between patients with anguish and those without anguish. Patients with anguish had lower DRS-R-98 total scores before medication than those without anguish (15.3±8.1 vs. 17.3±7.8, p=0.018), but higher severity score in lability of affect (1.2±0.8 vs 1.0±0.9, p=0.023). Conclusions: The results of this study suggested that patients with anguish tend to be younger, mostly do not have dementia, and have lower delirium severity score but higher score in lability of affect. Nevertheless, further research, investigating appropriate evaluations and medical interventions for patients with anguish is warranted.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Number of palliative care team increase every year, but the quality of team might differ from each other. We developed “Self-Check Program for Palliative Care Team” to assess and improve the quality of palliative care team. We report the result of the multi-center study to assess the feasibility of this program. Methods: We underwent the “Self-Check Program” as a trial at seven hospitals in Japan in February 2016. We took a questionnaire survey to team leaders and participants to assess the feasibility of this program. Results: Fifty-two medical staffs in six hospitals accomplished this program. Time scheduling and the integration of opinions from each team members were the difficulties came up from questionnaire survey. All team leaders and 87.8% of the participants answered that this program was effective to extract and improve the problem of the team. Also 83.3% of the team leaders were satisfied with the process of planning. Conclusion: Despite some difficulties, majority of the participants considering useful, this program is considered feasible.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The field survey was conducted to evince the current status of palliative care for non-cancer patients. Methods: The on-line questionnaire survey was conducted covering 196 representatives of the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine. Multiple-choice questions were asked about their medical experiences with non-cancerous diseases, their attitudes towards palliative care, their feelings of bewilderment upon providing palliative care, and what they thought would be required for future education in this field. Results: One-hundred and eleven (111) representatives (57%) responded the survey. Ninety-nine (99)% of the respondents experienced providing non-cancer patients with palliative care, but 63% of them experienced less than 50 patients in the terminal phases even in cumulative total. Eighty (80)% of them said they were feeling insecure about providing non-cancer patients with palliative care, and 83% of them were feeling difficulty when they had to do so. The reasons listed included that prognostic prediction for such cases wouldn’t be easy and that it wouldn’t be covered by public health insurances. What they felt necessary about future education included communication and multi-disciplinary team medicine, in this order. Conclusions: The representatives of the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine are well-aware of the demands for palliative care for non-cancer patients, but not many of them have experienced such cases and more than 80% of them are feeling insecure and difficulty about providing it.
ABSTRACT
Objectives：To clarify effectiveness of educational workshop in advance care planning (ACP) and clinical ethics based on education for implementing end-of-life discussion (E-FIELD) program. Methods：Pre-post questionnaire survey. We held workshop in ACP and clinical ethics based on E-FIELD program. We measured participant’s knowledge of ACP and difficulties of End-of-Life (EOL) discussion before and after the workshop. Results：In 37 participants, 34 participants finished the course. Improvement of knowledge of ACP and clinical ethics in post workshop survey was statistically significant (pre. 18.1 v.s. post 23.9, p<0.001, paired t test). In terms of difficulties of EOL discussion, 7 items in all 13 items questionnaire were improved significantly in post workshop survey (p<0.05, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusion：Educational workshop in ACP and clinical ethics based on E-FIELD program may improve knowledge of ACP and reduce difficulties of EOL discussion.
ABSTRACT
<b>Background：</b>A palliative care education program based on the Cancer Control Act, namely the Palliative care Emphasis Program on symptom management and Assessment for Continuous medical Education（PEACE）, has been run in Japan since 2008.<b> Purpose：</b>The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of PEACE for clinicalpractice. <b>Method：</b>Focus group interviews were conducted with 12 physicians who attended the program and were chosen by theoretical sampling. Two investigators independently performed thematic content analysis. <b>Results：</b>Qualitative analysis identified five main categories of usefulness of the program：（1）acquiring knowledge of palliative care；（2）acquiring skills to provide palliative care；（3）mastering an attitude of focusing on suffering；（4）acquiring knowledge about home palliative care；and（5）standardizing knowledge of basic palliative care in the community. Three main categories for program improvement were identified, namely the content and structure of the program, as well as the method of running the program. <b>Conclusion：</b>PEACE may be useful in providing systematic education in basic palliative care through the acquisition of basic knowledge and skills, discussion of cases with colleagues, observing good communication by other physicians, and networking in the community.
ABSTRACT
<b>Purpose</b>: We assessed the efficacy of a palliative care team (PCT) in improving quality of life (QOL) among Japanese cancer patients. <b>Patients and methods</b>: This prospective study involved adult patients treated in the Division of Respiratory Medicine and Medical Oncology/Hematology at Kobe University Hospital between November 1, 2009 and March 30, 2010. Every patient had requested intervention by the PCT. Patients were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire at baseline and 1 and 4 weeks after initiation of the PCT intervention. <b>Result</b>: Of the 35 patients enrolled, 26 patients and 15 patients completed the assessments at 1 and 4 weeks after starting the intervention, respectively. Pain subscale (PA) was improved at 1 week after starting the intervention (p<0.05). Dyspnea subscale (DY) and PA were improved at 4 weeks after starting the intervention (p<0.05). <b>Conclusion</b>: We prospectively showed that QOL of cancer patients was improved with the intervention of the PCT, using the Japanese version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL. Even if the PCT can only provide short-term care for cancer patients, this intervention appears worthwhile to improve QOL of cancer patients.